Published on January 29th, 2016 | by M. Morford


Location, location, location (how not to choose a site for a methanol plant)

There are three primary principles of real estate, whether residential, commercial or industrial: location, location and location. The Fukushima nuclear plants, for example, were built on Japan’s coastline for a practical and essential purpose; to ensure a steady, uninterrupted water supply to keep the system cool. The designers and engineers were very deliberate about the location of the reactors. It never occurred to them that the ocean waters essential to the cooling of the reactors would eventually lead to their destruction – and five years later, their continuing leakage of radioactive waste into the Pacific Ocean.

The proponents of the Northwest Innovations Works methanol plant insist that the Port of Tacoma is the ideal site for their facility – the largest methanol plant in the world. The intended site is already an industrial zone, it is on a well-maintained rail line, and, of course, it is on a major West Coast port.

I understand all that; in terms of established infrastructure, it is a perfect location.

But as with Fukushima, there are far larger, more enduring and more powerful forces to keep in mind. Everyone who knows the area knows that we are long overdue for an earthquake – the big one. Mt. Rainier, as we all know from seeing it or from the Port’s glossy marketing, hovers in the background.

Mt. Rainier is not dormant.

It could erupt any time, and the western face, the side that faces Puget Sound, is the oldest, most brittle, and most likely to fail. And when, not if, that side of the mountain fails, the mud and lava flow will follow the Puyallup River into Commencement Bay – right through the Port of Tacoma.

On the West Coast, we are more aware than most of the hazards of tsunamis. In the studies and modeling, there is one area of south Puget Sound that is particularly vulnerable – the Port of Tacoma. Rail lines and Port access are essential to our local economy, but they too would be swept away by any of these natural catastrophes.

To place a facility like this, both toxic and potentially explosive, in an obvious hazard zone is foolhardy at best. A general rule of thumb is to have potentially dangerous industrial sites at least three miles from residential areas. This plant is about one mile from downtown Tacoma and about that same distance from several residential neighborhoods.

This whole project is owned and paid for, not by some US based or even global corporation, but by the Chinese government. In China, fatal industrial accidents kill workers each day. Even if we imagine that Chinese building and manufacturing standards have miraculously improved, that the jobs are stable, safe, and use local labor, that the facility is safe, that we can afford a facility that uses the water and energy of a mid-sized city, and yes, that we need the product, then perhaps the methanol plant is worth building.

But should we, in an era of rapidly rising sea levels, increasing likelihood of serious earthquakes, and all of us facing an inevitable volcanic eruption, build a potentially hazardous facility in what is arguably the lowest and most vulnerable site on the West Coast?

We will be coping with the radioactive legacy of Fukushima for generations to come. The last thing we need is our own Tacoma brand of a toxic contribution to the Salish Sea.

When it comes to human made infrastructure versus nature, nature always wins.



Tags: , , , , ,

About the Author

Writer, teacher, community story-teller, poet, advocate of the oddities of earthly existence. Scavenger of the unlikely.

4 Responses to Location, location, location (how not to choose a site for a methanol plant)

  1. Linda Stoner says:

    I understand Governor Jay Inslee supports this plant being built in Tacoma. I wonder how supportive he would be if they wanted to build it on Bainbridge Island, near his home?

  2. Jeff says:

    The fear of the normal accident, will lead to economic paralysis. Not that I like China building anything in our country, but that’s another issue.

  3. Lee Heath says:

    We need to address a few more issues, and the first is that we do not have the amount of water for Tacoma and the Plant. Concerning the water as well is our Salmon flow and how that may be detrimentally affected. There are no long term plans as of yet for disposal of toxic byproducts that will, within years, begin to need to be taken care of. Where, How, Who will pay for this? I understand that this will provide Union jobs for years during its construction, but lets focus on the couple hundred jobs that will be long term. I haven’t heard anyone really touch this. How many jobs out of that will be pre-filled ? What jobs will actually be available and what will the skill/educational level be for those? Look into how many people our largest employers employ compared to apx 250 at a high risk facility. Yes, we are do for “the big one” sometime in the future, but driving home the environmental and reality of the amount of jobs provided are a true reality and not a “when it happens” issues that people can relate to. How will the incredible water usage affect Tacoma residents? We already were on water restrictions last year, and we would be a wasteland if the Plant was here. We love to fish, and be able to eat the fish. The salmon are not just for us, they travel down the coast and provide food for humans as well as other marine mammals. Good article, but sink some teeth into all the issues ~Stay Stellar~

  4. June says:

    Skype has opened its website-dependent client beta for the
    entire world, after starting it extensively inside the United states and U.K.
    before this 30 days. Skype for Website also now can handle Chromebook and Linux for instant online messaging connection (no voice and video nevertheless, all
    those require a plug-in installment).

    The increase in the beta contributes help for an extended listing of spoken languages to aid bolster that
    global user friendliness

Leave a Reply to Linda Stoner Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to Top ↑
  • Pages

  • Thank you to our sponsors

  • Look/Listen

  • Tacomagram

  • You like us

  • Comments & thoughts

  • Defiance in your inbox

    Subscribe to get Post Defiance newsletter style; we’ll make sure you don’t miss the good stuff.